Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a floor speech Wednesday that Republicans don’t have enough support from his caucus to advance their partisan six-month government funding legislation, which would inflict large cuts to non-military spending and bolster the Trump administration’s assault on federal agencies.

But Schumer’s
claim of Democratic unity following tense private caucus meetings was soon called into question as some members suggested the minority party could still cut a deal with Republicans to invoke cloture on the legislation—a move that would pave the way for passage of the bill with a simple-majority vote.

“Everybody in the caucus wants an opportunity to vote for a clean 30-day [continuing resolution] that puts us on a pathway to regular, legit appropriations,”
said Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), referring to an alternative government funding bill offered by Democratic appropriators ahead of the looming Friday shutdown.

“It’s not an unreasonable ask to say, if you want cloture, you’d better give us a vote,” Whitehouse added.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.)
similarly indicated that Democrats could be willing to help Republicans invoke cloture—which requires 60 votes—in exchange for votes on Democratic amendments.

If cloture is invoked, the GOP would no longer need Democratic support to push the bill through the Senate.

“Democrats had nothing to do with this bill,” Kaine told reporters following a closed-door caucus meeting on Wednesday. “And we want an opportunity to get an amendment vote or two. So that’s what we are insisting on to vote for cloture.”

“Any Senate Dem who thinks their left flank, or anyone else in their base who is determined to stop Trump, would accept this strategy is deeply deluded.”

Such remarks from Democrats led Josh Marshall of
Talking Points Memo to describe Schumer’s floor speech as “a head fake.”

“This is the Senate D caucus trying to fool their own supporters,” Marshall argued. “Sorry to say that but that’s what’s happening.”

In a blog post, Marshall
wrote that “this was a deal between Schumer and [Senate Majority Leader John] Thune to allow a brief performative episode to throw Democratic voters off the scent while the Democratic caucus allowed the bill to pass.”

“The deal is this: Democrats agree to give up the 60-vote threshold in exchange for being allowed to offer amendments to the House bill. The ‘amendment’ or ‘amendments’ will likely be some version of Sen. [Patty] Murray’s 30-day CR. It doesn’t even matter what they are. But this is all for show,” he explained. “Once you give up the 60-vote threshold, the whole thing is over.”

Progressive strategist Robert Cruickshank
wrote late Wednesday that “any Senate Dem who thinks their left flank, or anyone else in their base who is determined to stop Trump, would accept this strategy is deeply deluded.”

“This isn’t even about left or right or center,” Cruickshank wrote. “The divide within the Democratic Party is ‘fight’ versus ‘surrender.'”

The new comments from Schumer and members of his caucus came amid a
pressure campaign from House Democrats, grassroots organizers, advocacy groups, and the nation’s largest union of federal workers urging senators to oppose the Republican funding bill, even if it means risking a government shutdown at the end of the week.

The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), which is engaged in legal fights against the Trump administration’s large-scale attack on federal agencies,
wrote to senators on Wednesday that “a widespread government shutdown has been underway since January 20 and will continue to spread whether senators vote yes or no” on the Republican funding package.

“If H.R. 1968 becomes law—a measure that ignores the administration’s brazen refusal to carry out duly enacted laws of Congress and further erodes Congress’ power of the purse—AFGE knows that DOGE will dramatically expand its terminations of federal workers and double down on its campaign to make federal agencies fail because there will be nothing left to stop the administration for the balance of fiscal year 2025, if ever,” the union wrote.

At least one Senate Democrat who was seen earlier Wednesday as a possible vote for the GOP, Sen. John Hickenlooper of Colorado, vowed later in the day to oppose both cloture and the Republican bill itself, a sign that public outrage could be having an impact.

“Keep calling. Keep up the pressure,” Democratic strategist Matt McDermott wrote in response to the Colorado senator’s opposition.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who has been urging Democratic senators to oppose the Republican bill,
wrote Wednesday night that “House Democrats have stayed in D.C. to pass a 30-day clean government funding extension.”

“We are here to avert a shutdown and give Republicans the time they need to negotiate a bipartisan agreement,” Ocasio-Cortez added. “I’m here in D.C. ready to vote on a clean CR, and so is everyone else. Let’s do it.”