What The Hell America!

Two Democrats on the U.S. House Oversight Committee are seeking more information about the federal government’s use of billionaire Elon Musk’s Starlink, the satellite internet service operated by his company SpaceX, specifically at the White House complex and at the U.S. General Services Administration.

Reps. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.), the ranking member of the committee, and Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) are looking for proof that new usage of Starlink technologies is “secure and will not enrich Mr. Musk in violation of federal ethics rules,” according to a letter they sent Monday to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles, White House Director of Office Administration Joshua Fisher, and Acting Administrator at GSA Stephen Ehikian.

The letter references March reporting from The New York Times, which stated that Starlink is now accessible across the White House campus, after Starlink “donated” the service. NBC News reported last month that GSA had adopted Starlink for its internet access at the request of Musk’s staff, citing an unnamed source. Musk is also an adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump.

“Donations such as this raise considerable red flags as to whether Mr. Musk is using his position in the federal government to benefit his companies,” wrote the two Democrats.

A journalist at ProPublica observed this reported donation of Starlink resembles a tactic used by another company, Microsoft, during the Biden administration: offering free trials to get government locked in to using their technology.

“It doesn’t matter if it was Microsoft last year or Starlink today or another company tomorrow,” Jessica Tillipman, associate dean for government procurement law studies at George Washington University Law School, toldProPublica. “Anytime you’re doing this, it’s a back door around the competition processes that ensure we have the best goods and services from the best vendors.”

In their letter, the two Democrats also highlighted that Musk’s dual role as head of Starlink and “apparent leader” of Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency—which reporting indicates could soon come to a close—”raises significant ethical, security, and regulatory implications that warrant immediate attention.”

What’s more, his “dual position as the recipient of federal contracts and a White House adviser creates a troubling and obvious conflict of interest, raising the risk of undue influence and potential misuse of federal contracts for personal or corporate gain.”

This is far from the first time that concerns around potential conflicts of interests regarding Musk’s businesses and his role in the federal government have been raised.

Last month, a group of Democratic senators sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and acting Inspector General at the Transportation Department Mitch Behm demanding an investigation into whether Musk’s activities at the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have violated the criminal conflict of interest statute, citing reporting that Musk’s Starlink is involved in upgrading a crucial communication system at the FAA.

In their letter, Connolly and Brown said they are also concerned that the recent installation of Starlink at the White House raises potential cybersecurity and national security concerns.

The pair requested a list of information and documents from the White House and GSA, including all documents and communications relating to the legal or ethical implications of the White House and GSA using Starlink given Musk’s role in the federal government, as well as documents and communications regarding any security assessments related to the use of Starlink.